Fail to Remain at an Accident in Ontario

What does fail to remain mean?

The duty to stay or return

Section 200 of the Highway Traffic Act applies to a collision on a public road. This includes ordinary city streets and rural roads. It does not mean only a 400-series or multi-lane highway. The vehicles do not have to touch for the rule to apply.

Section 200(1)(a) requires the person in charge to stay at the scene or return immediately. Other parts of section 200 require help for those involved and certain information when requested. Reporting a collision later does not replace the duty to stay or return.

A traffic charge and a criminal charge are different

People often call this a hit-and-run charge. However, that phrase can describe different situations. The provincial traffic charge and the criminal charge are different. The law written on the court document tells you which charge you face.

The Criminal Code offence is called failure to stop after accident. It can apply in parking lots and other private places when its legal requirements are met. It has different facts to prove and different penalties.

The Act uses a broad definition of highway based on public vehicle use. Whether a particular road or access route fits that definition depends on the facts. Private ownership alone does not settle the question. The provincial charge can still bring jail or a suspension, despite not being a criminal offence.

Reporting the collision is a separate duty

Section 199 requires certain collisions to be reported immediately. In plain language, that means reporting right away. The duty applies where the law requires a report, including collisions involving injury or damage above the legal reporting amount.

If police direct someone to report at another location, section 199(1.1) says to go there forthwith. That means going without avoidable delay. Reporting and staying at the scene are separate duties. A later report does not automatically answer a fail-to-remain charge.

Penalties and fines

Court penalties under section 200(2)

A conviction can bring a fine of $400 to $2,000, up to six months in jail, or both. The court may also suspend the person's licence or permit for up to two years. These are possible court penalties, rather than automatic results in every case.

The court's Schedule 43 lists no set fine for fail to remain under section 200(1)(a). That does not mean there is no fine. A summons requires attention to the court process. Surcharges and costs can add to a fine imposed by the court.

Demerit points and licence consequences

Seven points after conviction

Ontario Regulation 339/94 assigns seven driver demerit points to an HTA section 200 conviction. Points are a consequence of the conviction, rather than a separate penalty the prosecutor can simply erase.

The seven points and a possible court-ordered suspension are different consequences. Existing points, licence class and new-driver rules can also matter. The demerit points guide explains how Ontario records points.

Possible insurance effects

The conviction matters

A collision can create more than one insurance concern. The collision, a traffic conviction and a licence suspension may each matter. The insurer considers the driver's record and its own approved rating and eligibility rules.

Three possible insurance concerns

• The collision: an at-fault collision may affect the premium or an accident-free discount. Fault and any accident-forgiveness coverage matter.
• The conviction: a traffic or criminal driving conviction may create another concern, separate from the collision itself.
• A licence suspension: the reason for the suspension and the driver's status may affect rates or access to coverage.

Together, serious driving events may lead to higher premiums or fewer insurance choices. Some drivers may need higher-risk coverage. However, these are not three automatic increases added together. A collision does not automatically mean the driver was at fault.

A broker or insurer can explain how its rules apply. A paralegal or lawyer can explain the possible court and licence consequences. Read more about insurance effects →

What must the prosecutor prove?

The main facts in the charge

The prosecutor must prove each required part of the charge beyond a reasonable doubt. The driver does not have to prove innocence. For the charge under section 200(1)(a), the wording of the law raises these main questions:

• Who was in charge of the vehicle or streetcar?
• Did a collision occur on a public road within the Act's legal definition?
• Was that vehicle directly or indirectly involved?
• Did the person fail to remain or return immediately?

This is a simple outline, rather than the full legal test. A paralegal or lawyer can review what the driver knew, what happened and what the evidence shows. Charges about helping others or giving information need their own review.

Disclosure means the police notes and other relevant information held by the prosecutor. A licensed paralegal can request and review it for the driver.

Can a traffic ticket paralegal help?

Reviewing the case and appearing in court

A licensed paralegal can obtain disclosure, review witness accounts and examine the collision evidence. Relevant material may include officer notes, video, vehicle damage, identification evidence and the timing of events. The paralegal can discuss the case with the prosecutor and appear at court dates within their permitted scope.

After reviewing the evidence, the paralegal can assess a trial, a possible withdrawal or any proposed resolution. A lesser charge is not guaranteed and must fit the facts. Anyone facing this traffic charge should seek advice from a licensed paralegal or lawyer before deciding what to do. For a criminal driving charge, speak with a criminal defence lawyer.

Early resolution and a conviction

An early resolution that includes a guilty plea may still leave a conviction on your driving record. That conviction may affect your insurance rates, even if the fine or demerit points are reduced.

A licensed paralegal can explain the evidence and the consequences of an offer before a plea is entered. Points follow the offence of conviction. No withdrawal or reduction is guaranteed. Read about early resolution and convictions →

Related information

• Use Plate Not Authorized for Vehicle in Ontario
• Driving Without a Valid Licence in Ontario
• How a licensed paralegal represents a driver
• Ontario demerit points

Sources and review information

The statute summary uses the official Act reference copy retrieved October 29, 2026. The court schedule and demerit regulation were checked October 30, 2026. This is general information, not legal advice or a claim of independent legal review. The law on the alleged offence date matters.

• Highway Traffic Act, section 200 — read the legal wording

  Reference copy · Source currency: October 26, 2026 · Retrieved 2026-10-29. This copy does not update automatically. Grey paragraphs identify source notes about changes not yet in force.

  Open this panel to load the section.

  Read in our Act reader · Official e-Laws source ↗

  Close legal wording ↑
• Ontario Regulation 339/94 — demerit-point table ↗
• Ontario Court of Justice — Schedule 43 ↗
• FSRA — factors affecting auto insurance rates ↗
• Ontario Court of Justice — court process ↗
• Criminal Code, section 320.16 — Failure to stop after accident ↗